nozzle additonal check condition #2954
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Yes, I have. : - ) |
|
@commy2 bad idea :D |
|
Not sure that idea applies to tanks. |
|
@VKing6 you can still start up tank engine within seconds in Arma so... |
|
Isn't this invalid syntax? |
|
I'm gonna test but I used wiki https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/isEngineOn |
|
I mean because the condition is using lazy evaluation and you've added a non-lazy condition onto the end |
|
Um... tell me how to fix? :) |
|
I'd add a line under 24 with:
|
thojkooi
added
kind/enhancement
|
In any case the lazy evaluation thing should be fixed @gienkov |
|
Fixed! |
|
👍 |
thojkooi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2016
nozzle additonal check condition
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Have you ever did refuel at gas station with engine on?